Colin Grainger
Today we do a dangerous thing. Today we poke a viper. And we know this one is carrying enough venom to mortally wound our entire nation unless we expose this new cadre of control freaks. I know that I use that term a lot, but this time, I use it knowing full well that that is what they are. They desire control, and they are brainwashed freaks. As in most items I post, I do not expect you to take my word for it. I offer a link below that you are duty bound to read, if you care for your freedom. Furthermore, you really have to continue your investigations into this insidious, nasty, shadowy group of people.
First, to give you some idea of what we are dealing with, I will cut & paste from the article stored at the provided link.
Then, I will post the names of those companies and organisations that have paid vast sums of money to carry out training, (I use the word "training" grudgingly, the actual technique is called "Neurological Linguistic Control", a known brainwashing technique, very similar to the Delphi Technique, which is used by anti-smoker groups on their members), I hope you will be shocked and stunned when you see some of the participating organisations. A great many of them are central and local government, which means that YOU and I paid for this systematic brainwashing which will be used against us.
Make no mistake, this is scary stuff. But, just like all monsters, once you have learned where they are, and what they feed on, it is much easier to slay them.
Just WHAT and WHO are we dealing with?
NEUROLOGICAL LINGUISTIC CONTROL OFFENSIVE
An expert in psychological manipulative techniques used by corrupt intelligence agencies has identified the agenda of this subversive organisation as neurological linguistic control, which means that it specialises in mind control and brainwashing. The technique used is akin to that employed by a parallel, but older, offensive, named Moral Rearmament (or MRA). What that old, well-funded operation does is to seek to strip its targets of all loyalties, the established neuro-control technique, by indoctrinating them into confessing all past ‘sins’ to the collective. The consequence, of course, is that many victims become blackmailable, and may therefore be less resistant to the next evil step – demands for money, which aim to deprive the victim of his or her independence and to strap them permanently to the organisation. In other words, the standard Tavistock-originated cult indoctrination techniques are used.
In the case of ‘Common Purpose’, its huge neurological linguistic control offensive is directed at sweeping all resident notions from the victim’s mind and psyche, and replacing them with ‘slides’ , or the ‘politically correct’ notions that the control manipulators seek to impose. As a component of the brainwashing that takes place at ‘Common Purpose’s’ fake ‘educational’ sessions, which are held all over Britain, the following cynical routine is employed in one way or another: first of all, a predetermined ‘consensus’ line is promulgated before the group; secondly, notions which conflict with the predetermined ‘consensus’ are dismissively, and perhaps rudely, debunked. In the event that anyone voices ‘dissenting’ views, they are sharply and insultingly criticised, à la Cultural Revolution, and made to look foolish in front of their peers. This is standard practice.
Thirdly, ‘lines’ are unveiled for all present to accept without question – preconceived ‘slides’ which are always so reasonable that no-one could dare object to them; and anyone who does, is forthwith labelled ('type-cast as') an ‘extremist’.
NEWLY BRAINWASHED OFTEN COME UNHINGED
We understand that certain attendees at these spurious events directed by Mrs Middleton from her office inside the OPDM, have suffered mental breakdowns and marriage break-ups. Victims are called upon to pay substantial sums by way of attendance fees, but do so willingly, or have employers who do so readily, just as those blackmailable Moral Rearmament victims are forced to part with funds – as it is none-too-subtly suggested that the path to preferment in the police, in hospital management, in local authorities, within multinational corporations, large banks and any of the other categories of organisation whose ‘Useful Idiot’ managements are sponsoring this subversive operation [see list below], is smoothed by graduating from these courses.
Here is a partial list:
Today we do a dangerous thing. Today we poke a viper. And we know this one is carrying enough venom to mortally wound our entire nation unless we expose this new cadre of control freaks. I know that I use that term a lot, but this time, I use it knowing full well that that is what they are. They desire control, and they are brainwashed freaks. As in most items I post, I do not expect you to take my word for it. I offer a link below that you are duty bound to read, if you care for your freedom. Furthermore, you really have to continue your investigations into this insidious, nasty, shadowy group of people.
First, to give you some idea of what we are dealing with, I will cut & paste from the article stored at the provided link.
Then, I will post the names of those companies and organisations that have paid vast sums of money to carry out training, (I use the word "training" grudgingly, the actual technique is called "Neurological Linguistic Control", a known brainwashing technique, very similar to the Delphi Technique, which is used by anti-smoker groups on their members), I hope you will be shocked and stunned when you see some of the participating organisations. A great many of them are central and local government, which means that YOU and I paid for this systematic brainwashing which will be used against us.
Make no mistake, this is scary stuff. But, just like all monsters, once you have learned where they are, and what they feed on, it is much easier to slay them.
Just WHAT and WHO are we dealing with?
NEUROLOGICAL LINGUISTIC CONTROL OFFENSIVE
An expert in psychological manipulative techniques used by corrupt intelligence agencies has identified the agenda of this subversive organisation as neurological linguistic control, which means that it specialises in mind control and brainwashing. The technique used is akin to that employed by a parallel, but older, offensive, named Moral Rearmament (or MRA). What that old, well-funded operation does is to seek to strip its targets of all loyalties, the established neuro-control technique, by indoctrinating them into confessing all past ‘sins’ to the collective. The consequence, of course, is that many victims become blackmailable, and may therefore be less resistant to the next evil step – demands for money, which aim to deprive the victim of his or her independence and to strap them permanently to the organisation. In other words, the standard Tavistock-originated cult indoctrination techniques are used.
In the case of ‘Common Purpose’, its huge neurological linguistic control offensive is directed at sweeping all resident notions from the victim’s mind and psyche, and replacing them with ‘slides’ , or the ‘politically correct’ notions that the control manipulators seek to impose. As a component of the brainwashing that takes place at ‘Common Purpose’s’ fake ‘educational’ sessions, which are held all over Britain, the following cynical routine is employed in one way or another: first of all, a predetermined ‘consensus’ line is promulgated before the group; secondly, notions which conflict with the predetermined ‘consensus’ are dismissively, and perhaps rudely, debunked. In the event that anyone voices ‘dissenting’ views, they are sharply and insultingly criticised, à la Cultural Revolution, and made to look foolish in front of their peers. This is standard practice.
Thirdly, ‘lines’ are unveiled for all present to accept without question – preconceived ‘slides’ which are always so reasonable that no-one could dare object to them; and anyone who does, is forthwith labelled ('type-cast as') an ‘extremist’.
NEWLY BRAINWASHED OFTEN COME UNHINGED
We understand that certain attendees at these spurious events directed by Mrs Middleton from her office inside the OPDM, have suffered mental breakdowns and marriage break-ups. Victims are called upon to pay substantial sums by way of attendance fees, but do so willingly, or have employers who do so readily, just as those blackmailable Moral Rearmament victims are forced to part with funds – as it is none-too-subtly suggested that the path to preferment in the police, in hospital management, in local authorities, within multinational corporations, large banks and any of the other categories of organisation whose ‘Useful Idiot’ managements are sponsoring this subversive operation [see list below], is smoothed by graduating from these courses.
Here is a partial list:
ABL Ltd, Bradford
Admiral Insurance Services Ltd
American Express, Brighton
ARRIVA, Head Office
ARRIVA, Leeds City Station
Arts Council England, North-West, Manchester
Astra Zeneca UK Limited, Macclesfield
Astron, Edinburgh
Aylesford Newsprint Ltd, Aylesford
BAE Systems, Rochester
Baillie Gifford & Co, Edinburgh
Baker Tilly, Milton Keynes
Barnsley College, Barnsley
Barnsley Hospice, Barnsley
BASF Plc, Middlesbrough
Bayer CropScience, Norwich
Begbroke Science Park, University of Oxford, Yarnton
British Petroleum, Grangemouth
Bradford Vision, Bradford
Brighton & Hove City Council, Hove – King's House
Brighton & Hove Economic Partnership, Brighton
BSkyB, Dunfermline
BT Scotland, Edinburgh – Alexander Graham Bell House
BUPA Ireland, Dublin
Business Link, North & Western Lancashire
Cairn Energy Plc, Edinburgh
Campsmount School, Doncaster
Cardiff City AFC, Cardiff
Cathays High School, Cardiff
ChamberLink Ltd, Manchester
Chapel Royal , Brighton
Cherwell School, Oxford
City and County of Cardiff, Cardiff – County Hall
City College Coventry, Butts Centre
City Of Bradford Metropolitan District Council, Bradford
Clackmannanshire Council, Alloa
Cork Prison, Cork
Coventry Evening Telegraph, Coventry
Darton High School, Barnsley
Department for Education and Skills, Darlington
Derby College, Derby
Dewsbury Health Care NHS Trust, Dewsbury & District Hospital
Diageo plc, Dublin
Diageo plc, Leven – Banbeath Industrial Estate
Diamond Corrugated Cases Ltd, Londonderry
Dixons City Academy, Bradford
Donnington Valley Hotel, Newbury
Dover Harbour Board, Dover
Dublin Bus, Dublin
Dubrovnik Hotel, Bradford
EON UK plc, Coventry
Education Bradford, Bradford
Education Client Team, Bradford
Egg, Derby
EMI Records Group UK and Ireland, London
English Institute of Sport Sheffield, Sheffield
Eversheds, Cardiff
Fife College, Kirkcaldy
Fife Constabulary, Police Headquarters
Fife Council, Kirkcaldy – Town House
Ford Motor Company Limited, Southampton
Forth Valley College of Further & Higher Education, Falkirk Campus
Fox's Biscuits, Batley
Glasgow City Council, City Chambers
Glasgow Science Centre, Glasgow
GlaxoSmithKline, Dartford – Acacia Hall
Goodwin Resource Centre Association, Hull
Grattan plc, Bradford
Grimsby and Scunthorpe Newspapers Ltd, Grimsby
Gripple Ltd, Sheffield
Hartlepool Primary Care Trust, Hartlepool
Headquarters 2nd Infantry Brigade, Folkestone
Health Promotion, Coventry
HM Prison Cardiff, Cardiff
HM Prison Edinburgh, Edinburgh
HM Prison Glenochil, Tullibody
HM Prison HMYOI Polmont, Falkirk
HM Prison Maidstone, Maidstone
HM Prison Stafford, Stafford
HM Prison Standford Hill, Sheerness
HM Prison Swaleside, Isle of Sheppey
Home Office Refugee Integration Section, Croydon
Hothouse Centre for Ceramic Design, Stoke-on-Trent
HSBC Bank plc, Manchester
Hull Citybuild, Hull
Hull Cityventure Limited, Hull
Huntsman Petrochemicals [UK] Ltd, Redcar
IBM United Kingdom Limited, Edinburgh
Indian Muslim Welfare Society, Batley
John Wheatley College, Glasgow
Karmand Community Centre, Bradford
Keele University, Keele
Keepmoat plc, Doncaster
Kellogg's, Manchester
Kent Thameside Delivery Board, Gravesend
Kickstart, Sheffield
Kimberly-Clark Ltd, Barton-Upon-Humber
Kingston upon Hull City Council, The Guildhall
Komedia, Brighton
Laganside Corporation, Belfast
Lancashire Constabulary, Nr Preston
Learning + Skills Council, Hull
Legal & General, Cardiff - 2 Fitzalan Place
Longley Park Sixth Form College, Sheffield
Lothian Buses plc, Edinburgh
Marriott Hotel, Glasgow
Marriott Hotel, Sunderland
Marriott Sprowston Manor Hotel & Country Club, Norwich
Maxxium UK Ltd, Stirling
McCann FitzGerald Solicitors, Dublin
Meadowhall Centre Limited, Sheffield
Medway Ports, Sheerness
Met Office, Exeter
Middlesbrough Borough Council, Middlesbrough – Vancouver House
Millennium Chemicals, Grimsby
Milton Keynes Museum, Milton Keynes
MKM Building Supplies Ltd, Hull
National Children's Centre, Huddersfield
National Museum of Photography, Film & Television, Bradford
New Appointments Group, Sittingbourne
Newbury Town Council, Newbury
Newcastle Building Society, Newcastle Upon Tyne
North Lincolnshire Council, Scunthorpe
Northern Echo, Darlington
Northern Lincolnshire & Goole Hospitals NHS Trust, Scunthorpe
Northwest Development Agency, Warrington
Norwich City Council, City Hall
Novartis Grimsby Ltd, Grimsby
O2 Ireland, Dublin
OCR, Coventry
Outokumpu Stainless Ltd, Sheffield
Oxford City Council, St Aldate's Chambers
Panasonic UK Ltd, Bracknell
Patcham High School, Brighton
Pfizer Limited, Sandwich – Ramsgate Road
PricewaterhouseCoopers, London – Embankment Place, Head Office
PricewaterhouseCoopers, London – Plumtree Court
Prudential plc, Reading
Prudential plc, Stirling
PSA Peugeot Citroen, Coventry
PSA Peugeot Citroen, Manufacturing Plant
Quest International Ltd, Ashford
REACT, Rotherham
Reading Borough Council, Reading
Reed In Partnership, Doncaster
Ridgewood School, Doncaster
Robin Hood Airport, Doncaster Sheffield, Doncaster
Rok Build, Reading
Rolls-Royce plc, Inchinnan
Rotherham College of Arts and Technology, Dinnington
Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Edinburgh – The Younger Building
Safefood, Cork
Salford Primary Care Trust, Salford
Scottish Enterprise Forth Valley, Stirling
Scottish Enterprise, Glasgow
Scottish Executive, Edinburgh – Victoria Quay
Sheffield City Council, Sheffield – Town Hall
Shepherd Neame Ltd, Faversham
Shoosmiths Solicitors, Milton Keynes
Slough Enterprise Gateway, Slough
South Norfolk District Council, Norwich
South Wales Fire Service, Cardiff
St Andrews Bay Hotel, St. Andrews
St Saviours C of E Church, Folkestone
St Simon Stock School, Maidstone
Staffordshire University, Stafford
Stoke-on-Trent City Council, Stoke on Trent
Strathclyde Police, Headquarters
Sussex County Cricket Club, Hove
Sussex Innovation Centre, Brighton
Sussex Police, Hove Police Station
Swale Borough Council, Sittingbourne
Swale Forward, Swale
Swale Primary Care Trust, Sittingbourne
Swan Valley Community School, Swanscombe
Tesco Charity Trust, Cheshunt
Thames Valley Police, Reading – Castle Street
Thames Valley Police, Slough
The Bridge (Oxford) Ltd, Oxford
The Brighton Dome and Brighton Festival, Brighton
The City of Edinburgh Council, Head Office
The Grimsby Institute of Further & Higher Education, Grimsby
The Recovery Project, Brighton
The Thornbury Centre, Bradford
Thomson Snell & Passmore (Solicitors), Tunbridge Wells
Tonbridge Grammar School, Tonbridge
Unipart (DCM), Oxford
University of Bradford, Bradford
University of Glasgow, Glasgow
University of Greenwich, Chatham
Scary? Or does it simply help you to join the dots? HMG have encroached far more into our lives than any other British government. It’s not hard to see why, when you factor in the above (and the linked) information.
Now we know who they are. Now we know where they are. Now we know what their true common purpose is, we can fight back.
Together, we can defeat them.
10 comments:
Have you heard of Common Purpose? Have you heard of the Fabian Society? Did you know they are connected?
John Prescott introduced a system into England called Common Purpose. If you are not aware of Common Purpose then please read this first before continuing.
Part of the rules laid down by Common Purpose are to hold meetings to Chatham House rules. which simply means "...nothing discussed in said meeting can be discussed in any way, outside of said meeting..." Now Chatham House is also the head quarters of the Fabian Society. John Prescott is a Fabian. Now Common Purpose's sole objective is basically to: Infiltrate, Destroy then Recreate in a Fabianistic way.
Please note:
Common Purpose has members in the NHS, BBC, the police, the legal profession, the church, many of Britain’s 7,000 quangos, local councils, the Civil Service, government ministries, Parliament, and it controls many RDA's (Regional Development Agencies).
Cressida Dick is the Common Purpose senior police officer who authorised the "Shoot to kill" policy without reference to Parliament, the law or the British Constitution. Jean de Menezes was one of the innocents who died as a result. Her shoot to kill policy still stands today.
You might be interested to know that the man who taught the Queen about Constitutional Law was a Fabian by the name of Sir Henry Martin. Sir Henry went to Balliol College Oxford with Arthur Toynbee (another Fabian) who in turn taught the late Prime Minister Edward Heath. (please note: Oxford University promotes and teaches PPE. Blair, Cameron and numerous other top MP's have degree's in PPE.)
Arthur Toynbee said at the 4th meeting of the conference for: International Institutions for the Scientific Study of International Relations held June 8th - 10th 1931 in Copenhagen, Denmark.
"...I will not prophesise, I will merely repeat that we are at present working discreetly but with all our might, to rest this mysterious political force called Sovereignty, out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands. because to impugn the sovereign of the local national states of the world is still heresy, for which a statesman or a publicist can be, perhaps, not quite burnt at the stake but certainly ostracized and discredited. The dragon of the local Sovereign can still use it's teeth and claw when it is bought to bay..."
The purpose of these conferences was to: by the leap of nations international cooperation to affiliate cooperation between institutions of international affairs of different countries.
In other words - Globalisation. Lets take for example the UK. We could have chose Serbia, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, America, Canada, the list is endless but we for now concentrate on England. So what did Toynbee mean by his speech. Basically to carry on with a process started in England by Asquith in 1911 by the Parliament Act 1911 to destroy England's Sovereignty, then it's Democracy and it's Constitutional Laws. Leading the people of England into believing that what they are doing is for our own good, when on the contrary they are destroying our Sovereignty and our country. Changing the constitutional laws as they go Illegally to suit their globalistic needs, resulting in the loss of our constitution and our democracy for what reason a one world empire. As reported by the Times - The Brussels bureaucrat who would be emperor. José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission
“Now what we have is the first non-imperial empire. We have 27 countries that fully decided to work together and to pool their sovereignty. I believe it is a great construction and we should be proud of it.”
In case this page gets removed which has a habit of happening. we have copied it for permanent reference.
So for all of you who haven't quite caught up the words "...pool their sovereignty..." are the key and the proof alone. How can we pool our sovereignty? We have a monarch bound by constitutional laws - or does this mean that our government have told the EU something they haven't told us? Are they saying that our constitution and are monarch do not exist any more? Because it certainly seems that way. Does this mean that Gordon Brown wants the people to be sovereign, So we can pool our sovereignty with the EU - in other words except foreign rule. Do you see now how fitting Toynbee's Fabian speech was in 1931 and how it fits in perfectly to what is going on now. Can you see how these people slowly undermine and destroy sovereign countries to achieve their goal.
Our Queen is no longer head of this country, she is in fact just an illusion. This is exactly what the Fabians want and are achieving and this is TREASON. Please read this or the Sunday Express report on this subject.
The Pledge - Successive governments using automatic assent.
The Turn - Completely ignoring constitutional law but making out what they are doing is legal.
The Prestige - Sovereignty destroyed, Constitution destroyed, Democracy destroyed, England destroyed.
The Fabians in government are doing their utmost to destroy our constitution and fool us into believing, that if the people become sovereign, the people themselves will govern our country - when the reality is the people will be governed by the EU and the EU will destroy this country.
Labour are Fabians they took on Fabianism many years ago before we were even born.
Deception. change by any means available is their way.
We ignore this fact at our peril!!
The last thing they want revealed is that labour are indeed Fabians.
Blair brown even Sarah his wife that makes gay gordon legit are all Fabians.
Infiltration into the other two parties explains why all three speak the same in every way!
The rest are too scared.
http://uk.encarta.msn.com/text_761563922___4/Labour_Party_(Great_Britain).html
Hostory of the labour party without any mention of....
http://www.freedom-force.org/freedomcontent.cfm?fuseaction=fabianwindow&refpage=issues
Blair was chairman.now it's the islam loving Dennis Mc Shay.
Fabians adore using islam.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who is a member of the Fabian Society. [1]
The Fabians originally were an elite group of intellectuals who formed a semi-secret society for the purpose of bringing socialism to the world. Whereas Communists wanted to establish socialism quickly through violence and revolution, the Fabians preferred to do it slowly through propaganda and legislation. The word socialism was not to be used. Instead, they would speak of benefits for the people such as welfare, medical care, higher wages, and better working conditions. In this way, they planned to accomplish their objective without bloodshed and even without serious opposition. They scorned the Communists, not because they disliked their goals, but because they disagreed with their methods. To emphasize the importance of gradualism, they adopted the turtle as the symbol of their movement. The three most prominent leaders in the early days were Sidney and Beatrice Webb and George Bernard Shaw. [2] A stained-glass window from the Beatrice Webb House in Surrey, England is especially enlightening. Across the top appears the last line from Omar Khayyam:
Dear love, couldst thou and I with fate conspire
To grasp this sorry scheme of things entire,
Would we not shatter it to bits, and then
Remould it nearer to the heart's desire!
Beneath the line Remould it nearer to the heart's desire, the mural depicts Shaw and Webb striking the earth with hammers. Across the bottom, the masses kneel in worship of a stack of books advocating the theories of socialism. Thumbing his nose at the docile masses is H.G. Wells who, after quitting the Fabians, denounced them as "the new machiavellians." The most revealing component, however, is the Fabian crest which appears Between Shaw and Webb. It is a wolf in sheep's clothing!
A cabinet of wolves...which require slaying.
EU..Run by Fabians..Mandleson fabian numer one at eu.
Common Purpose and The Fabian society are connected!
Fabian Socialism is a "mixture" of Fascism, Nazism, Marxism and Communism
all bundled together.
However, it is much more deadly because it is much more clever and subtle.
The only difference between Fabian Socialism and Communism is that Communists
take your house by directly sending in the "secret police" to knock your
front door down Fabian Socialists do it much more subtly and cleverly
by "gradually" taking your individual rights away, by "gradually" increasing
property taxes and rates, and finally, when you can't pay them, they send
in their regional "council tax inspectors" to take your house away
but the end result is the same.
British PM Tony Blair and President George Bush Junior's globalist
"war on terror" is a classic Fabian Socialist strategy.
The philosophy of the Fabian Society was written in 1887 and included the
statement: "The Fabian Society acknowledges the principal tenet of Marxism
the abolition of private property etc." (of course this does not apply to
the elect oligarchy at the top who end up owning the lot!).
Sidney and Beatrice Webb published a book of 1143 pages in defense of
Bolshevism. It was entitled Soviet Communism: A New Civilization.
In April 1952 the Webbs were exposed before a US Senate Committee on
the Judiciary when Soviet Colonel I. M. Bogolepov, a former Red Army officer,
stated that the entire text had been prepared by himself in the Soviet
Foreign Office.
Appropriately, the defiant coat of arms of the Fabian Society (commissioned
by author/playwright co-founder George Bernard Shaw) today (now archived)
is a "wolf in sheep's clothing."
Until recently it also appeared on the Fabian glass window (now removed)
in the Beatrice Webb House at Dorking, Surrey. (see enclosures)
Today the Fabian Society is among other things the intellectual wing of
the British Labour Party.
Before Tony Blair became British Prime Minister in May 1997, he was
Chairman of the Fabian Society.
Since the 1997 British general election there have been around 200
Fabian MP's in the House of Commons, some of whom have formed almost
entire Labour Cabinets including Gordon Brown, Robin Cook, Jack Straw,
David Blunkett, Peter Hain, Patricia Hewitt, John Reid, Ruth Kelly, Alan
Milburn and Clare Short.
Headed by Tony Blair, Fabians now dominate the entire British government.
They are resident in all parties and sit on all important select committees,
commissions and organizations allied to the government.
A good web-site on the subject is: www.lindsayjenkins.com/
The Fabian Society literally controls the European Union.
German-born Gisela Stuart, the Labour MP for Birmingham Edgbaston since
1997, and member of the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee,
was one of two House of Commons' Representatives on the European Convention
and a member of the Presidium of the Convention on the Future of Europe.
The Presidium was the drafting body that created the draft Constitution for
Europe.
In her book, The Making of Europe's Constitution , published in December 2003
by the Fabian Society, p. 20-21, Gisela writes:
"In the early months, the Presidium members would meet in a small room in the
Justus Lipsius Building some fifteen minute walk from the European Parliament.
Attendance was limited to the thirteen members, the Secretary General Sir
John Kerr, his deputy and the press officer.
Sir John Kerr, a former Permanent Secretary of the British Foreign Office,
conducted the proceedings inside the Presidium and in the plenary sessions
of the Convention with deft diplomatic skill as might be expected from
someone who John Major called 'Machiavelli' in his autobiography.
The best description of his talents I heard was: 'When Kerr comes up to
you and asks for the time, you wonder why me and why now?'
On several occasions, we would retreat to the Val Duchess a small palace
used by the Belgian foreign minister. It was at one of the dinners at Val
Duchess that the skeleton of the draft constitution was given to members
of the presidium in sealed brown envelopes the weekend before the public
presentation.
We were not allowed to take the documents away with us.
Just precisely who drafted the skeleton, and when, is still unclear to me,
but I gather much of the work was done by Valery Giscard d'Estaing and
Sir John Kerr over the summer.
There was little time for informed discussion, and even less scope for
changes to be made."
Today the Labour Parties in both New Zealand and Australia are closely
affiliated to the Fabian Society in London.
http://www.smeems.net/fam/gov/loc/64AAPCN7.htm
Flanders Fields | April 16th, 2008 at 1:21 am
May I suggest one source for learning about the practical application of the Magna Carta to todays’ issues? We must resist present attempts to remove us from the Common Law system, both in the UK and the US. Unless we relearn our history of freedom, it will be utterly destroyed. I enclose the link and a short segment from within this work dealing with Trial by Jury, by Lysander Spooner:
http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext98/tbjry10.txt
“The barons of England, sustained by the common people, having
their king in their power, compelled him, as the price of his throne,
to pledge himself that he would punish no freeman for a violation
of any of his laws, unless with the consent of the peers that is, the
equals of the accused.
The question here arises, Whether the barons and people intended
that those peers (the jury) should be mere puppets in the hands of
the king, exercising no opinion of their own as to the intrinsic
merits of the accusations they should try, or the justice of the laws
they should be called on to enforce? Whether those haughty and
victorious barons, when they had their tyrant king at their feet,
gave back to him his throne, with full power to enact any
tyrannical laws he might please, reserving only to a jury (” the
country”) the contemptible and servile privilege of ascertaining,
(under the dictation of the king, or his judges, as to the laws of
evidence), the simple fact whether those laws had been
transgressed? Was this the only restraint, which, when they had all
power in their hands, they placed upon the tyranny of a king,
whose oppressions they had risen in arms to resist? Was it to
obtain such a charter as that, that the whole nation had united, as it
were, like one man, against their king? Was it on such a charter
that they intended to rely, for all future time, for the security of
their liberties? No. They were engaged in no such senseless work
as that. On the contrary, when they required him to renounce
forever the power to punish any freeman, unless by the consent of
his peers, they intended those powers should judge of, and try, the
whole case on its merits, independently of all arbitrary legislation,
or judicial authority, on the part of the king. In this way they took
the liberties of each individual and thus the liberties of the whole
people entirely out of the hands of the king, and out of the power
of his laws, and placed them in the keeping of the people
themselves. And this itwas that made the trial b jury the palladium
of their liberties.
The trial by jury, be it observed, was the only real barrier
interposed by them against absolute despotism. Could this trial,
then, have been such an entire farce as it necessarily must have
been, if the jury had had no power to judge of the justice of the
laws the people were required to obey? Did it not rather imply that
the jury were to judge independently and fearlessly as to
everything involved in the charge, and especially as to its intrinsic
justice, and thereon give their decision, (unbiased by any
legislation of the king,) whether the accused might be punished?
The reason of the thing, no less than the historical celebrity of the
events, as securing the liberties of the people, and the veneration
with which the trial by jury has continued to be regarded,
notwithstanding its essence and vitality have been almost entirely
extracted from it in practice, would settle the question, if other
evidences had left the matter in doubt.”
Much information is available within the text dealing with issues other than, but related to, Trial by Jury.
important we learn to use this.
Moving without doubt to what will be a Marxist/Fabian run Europe we'd better be aware of all that we shall be facing and before it's too late try to get the knowledge out far and wide.
Dissent will not be allowed reading yesterday a poster at Cramer regarding not enough places to lock up everyone.
Nothing has been left to chance even the USA has undergone a massive building programme of detention centres built by Kellog and Brown across the USA.
When governments fail to mention these facts then we know thats' because they prefer it is kept secret away from public scrutiny our job is to place spokes in their fast moving wheel.
Common purpose, Fabians, are all linked together tentacles stretching across not only the UK and Europe but across the whole western world.
Europe the EU and EUMED..
USA Mexico and Canada.
Australia Asian countries.
That just covers the whole world..NWO.
Concentration Camps Await EU Dissidents
By Mike James on the Border of Switzerland – 29 February 2008
"The European Union is a ‘monster’ that must be destroyed, the sooner the better. Nothing will happen and no-one will go to jail. Today you can still do that. But I do not know what the situation will be tomorrow." – Vladimir Bukovsky
"But fight we will, for we are English and we are brave, and their losses will unexpectedly great." - MJ
----------
At a time when the European Union, having fully implemented every single provision of the Schengen Convention that allows for passport-free access from within and (in many cases) without the borders of this monstrously burgeoning Soviet Empire, having concomitantly no problem with permitting a near unrestricted flood of asylum seekers and economic migrants from Asia and North Africa, who arrive in vast numbers to seek welfare benefits and black market jobs, one is forced to consider a more sinister reason for the explosive growth of concentration camps that are now to be found in every corner of this despised amalgamation of formerly free and sovereign nations.
According to a December 30, 2007, report by the International Herald Tribune, ‘Obscurity and confinement for migrants in Europe’, reporter Caroline Brothers [somewhat misguidedly] reported on the reactivation of former Gulags and concentration camps throughout the length and breadth of Europe ostensibly to deal with unprecedented numbers of ‘unwanted migrants’, a claim that can only bring a smile of derision to the faces of long-suffering native Europeans who are now considering themselves an ethnic minority in their own homelands.
"The total known capacity for all the ‘closed’ EU camps is 30,871, according to [a] European Parliament study," Brothers reports. "When ‘open’ camps, to which ‘asylum-seekers’ [my parenthesis] are obliged to return at night, are included, the total rises to 40,979 .... Bilateral agreements, raising concerns about dubious alliances and human rights violations, have given rise to camps in peripheral states like Morocco, Tunisia, Ukraine, Libya and Turkey.
Governments are reluctant to admit to their existence, let alone permit entry to the camps; a reporter was denied access to centres in Greece and the Canary Islands of Spain; under the government of Silvio Berlusconi, Italy barred even the United Nations refugee agency from its centre on the Italian island of Lampedusa. The current prime minister, Romano Prodi, allowed the agency in.
The camps are concentrated along Europe's eastern and southern borders, while a large swathe of them runs east-west through Poland, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Germany, according to Migreurop, a network of researchers and lawyers that has mapped the phenomenon." [1]
The article continues to describe the horrific conditions in which so-called ‘illegal migrants’ are held prior to deportation, and yet all of the enquiries I have lodged directly to members of the German Bundestag and its press department for the 'Ausschuss für Menschenrechte und humanitäre Hilfe' (Human Rights Committee) and a direct question to Jean-Claude Thebault, the Deputy Head of the European Commission, have lead me to believe that such detention centres either do not exist in the form they have been described or are intended for unspecified purposes, necessarily to be activated during what some MEPs have surreptitiously (and off-the record) described as an "unforeseen emergency".
Such denials, of course, are par for the course, yet I was unable to ascertain further, despite persistent questioning of a number of delegates I know personally at Strasbourg, the exact nature of any unspecified ‘future emergency’ that would presumably see the activation of concentration camps holding up to 40,979, of which a large number are discreetly hidden from view in the British Isles, and which are mandated in their ordinances by stipulated detentions of up to 18 months.
There is a much discussed yet largely assumed unwritten protocol that informs discourse in the Federal Republic of Germany that deems it highly impolite, even bordering on illegality, to suggest that Germany ever exercise her democratic right to withdraw from the European Union. The acclaimed writer and journalist, Juergen Roth, even informed me, as far back as 1997, that political agitation to the effect of German secession from the EU could be met with imprisonment. In fact, there is no assumption about it. It is illegal in Germany to propose withdrawal from the EU.
The undemocratic and unratified Lisbon Treaty, far from abolishing the death penalty (which in any case I feel is appropriate for murderers, lying politicians, bank fraudsters, war criminals and rapists) makes specific provision for the death penalty to be exacted only against those exercising their democratic rights in rebelling against the European Union during a time of ‘war or social emergency’. I wonder what sort of twist a corrupt Jewish lawyer such as Blair’s former English-hating Attorney General Lord Goldsmith could spin on such a clause? Does not a burst water pipe constitute a social emergency? The exact wording states: "In a time of war or during a period in which a war is imminent, or in the face of social discontent or a revolt, which must be repressed, the death sentence is deemed fully legitimate." [2]
Something which the awfully trustworthy Gordon Brown, his predecessor the child-killer Tony Blair, or your Your Fucking Highness, the demonic, treasonous ‘Queen’ Elisabeth, singularly failed to tell you poor munchkins as they sniggered over the details of the illegal Lisbon Treaty. And munchkins you will always be in their world of 500,000-dollar luncheon speaking fees.
Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and the entire House of Windsor represent the kind of traitors no civilised nation on earth would tolerate for more than five minutes. Fortunately for those of us who love our own people and, with patience and due forbearance plan ahead, a resurgent Republican and Independent England is still one of the finest producers of properly greased, eight-coiled hangman’s rope.
Although the unlawful Lisbon Treaty, which received neither the assent of the people by means of a democratic referendum or a fair and open public debate in the Bilderberg and Zionist-controlled media that purports to inform European opinion, does technically allow England to withdraw from the nightmare socialist superstate into which we have been led like drugged animals on a leash, the penalties for such an act of defiance, so they say, would far outweigh any short-term benefits, for sanctions would be imposed by a triumvirate of EU, ASEAN and NAFTA power blocks, all of whom are now forming the basis of an integrated New World Order police state against which only the brave would dare to fight.
But fight we will, for we are English and we are brave, and their losses will unexpectedly great.
Vladimir Bukovsky, a man who personally witnessed the full horrors of what it is like to live as a dehumanised slave in a Godless, socialist system of humiliating and soul-destroying tyranny, recently warned the people of Europe that they are sleep-walking into a fascist nightmare greater than anything the world has ever experienced before.
In a frank and impassioned interview with the ‘Brussels Journal’, Bukovsky warned that the European Union is a "monster that must be destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a full-fledged totalitarian state." [3]
As a harrowed survivor of some 12 years imprisonment, including his subjection to physical and psychological torture, Bukovsky finally gained access to the definitive blueprint that informed the founding basis of the European Union in its sinister and slippery transmogrification from the somewhat benign EEC into a politically correct socialist, quasi-fascistic dictatorship that will make the USSR look like a good-humoured cricket match on a dismal but promisingly sunny day.
Bukovsky, knowing that only the people of England have in them the fight to bring an end to the fascist monolith that threatens to destroy their freedoms and the happiness of their children and grandchildren, enjoins them to defy the traitors in Whitehall and Westminster by refusing to pay their taxes, saying, "Nothing will happen and no-one will go to jail. Today you can still do that. But I do not know what the situation will be tomorrow with a fully fledged Europol staffed by former Stasi or Securitate officers. Anything may happen."
"We are losing time," he continued. We have to defeat them. We have to sit and think, work out a strategy in the shortest possible way to achieve maximum effect. Otherwise it will be too late. So what should I say? My conclusion is not optimistic. So far, despite the fact that we do have some anti-EU forces in almost every country, it is not enough. We are losing and we are wasting time."
Bukovsky is right, and his message was kept out of the mainstream press. Not even the Americans, those who once held themselves up as the proudest of the free, published one word of his chilling warning. I wonder why?
I shall end on this note. I am an Englishman who left England in 1992, deeply disillusioned at the way in which my people, the salt of the earth and the finest race of men and women that has ever walked the face of this planet, was being sold into a slavery based upon salacious and hollow economic enticements and a perverse consumerist culture of cheap lies and instant gratification. I have watched from afar the moral and physical degeneration of a folk once destined to achieve everything that was theirs as of right, written in the stars from yonder the arrival of the first Celt on English soil.
I have seen my people despoiled by an influx of aliens who loathe and detest the essential beauty and incomparable creativity of the English and Celtic peoples, and I have witnessed the sharp intellectual and moral decline in my brothers and sisters whose place is at the top of the world, not at the bottom of a anti-human dung-pile of social and cultural filth.
Since then I have lived among your kinfolk, the Germans, whom you have falsely been taught to despise by those of a hostile non-European demonic race who own the publishing houses and Hollywood, run the financial markets, write the history books, and own the electronic media you consume daily. I now see little difference between any of our Celtic and Saxon races, for you have sought homogeneity not in the strengths of what once made you culturally magnificent genotypes but in the commonalities of what seem to me the least worthy aspirations any kind of thinking human being would entertain as even remotely conscionable.
If there still be within you in the spirit that once marked you out as English and proud of it, if there yet be within your soul a flame that burns with indignant anger whenever it perceives the flabby incursions of obscenely grotesque liars and traitors such as the Walrus Brown and his piggy horde of obese socialist trough-nosing parasites and his equally treacherous butt-lickers who sit fat-arsed with suitably farting eloquence on the benches of Her Decrepit Majesty’s Disloyal opposition benches, then, for at least once in your television-addicted lives, take a sledge-hammer in your hands and smash the edifice of the disingenuous constructions that stand between you and your dignity as a proud and free people.
The time for polite remonstrations is over. If you, People of England, wish to remain free and regain your nation for yourselves once more, you must fucking fight like you have never fought before, neither less fierce as patriots during the civil war or with less resilience against a blitz financed by double-dealing Zionist murderers who played brothers against brothers. Although I am an old man, and in no position to lead you, I shall even abandon my cabin on the border of Switzerland to join you in your fight on the streets of London against the lying scum that have made fools and children of God’s finest people.
But if you will go willingly go into one of the concentration camps that await those not wholly enamoured of the impoverished and intellectually castrating social-fascist European Union that beckons you with the politically correct sly politics of wall-to-wall digital pornography and the titillating promise of perpetually unrealisable televisual illusions, then you are neither my countrymen, nor human beings worthy of the name, and I shall therefore disown you.
No Englishman who has tasted the scent of a strawberry field on a warm summer’s day, or who has written unrequited romantic tomes dedicated to the English maiden who broke his heart but mended his strength and stemmed his tears with beer and cheer, or who sallied for a day or two across pastures and meadows without once being challenged to show his ‘papers’ to an officiously uniformed gendarme, or came happenstance upon misfortune to be guided by those who owed him no fealty other than the common badge of his Englishness will never, ever, succumb to the slavery of the Soviet European Union.
Under the sunlit skies of a gilded July morning, and lightly kissed in the fruitful and mellow mists of an oaken November evening, there is only one England, destined once more to be everything she was meant to be; and in that land lovers will dream dreams and children will tell tales and old folks will smile in fond remembrance and dutiful thanks for what otherwise could have been.
And of the European Union and the New World Order, a distant memory, not a single world will be said.
And you shall be free.
References:
[1] Concentration camps in the Europea Union:
www.iht.com/articles/2007/12/30/europe/greece.php
[2] Crackdown on dissent in the EU and death penalty for dissidents (In German. Ed.):
http://globalfire.tv/nj/07de/politik/eu_bolschewismus.htm
[3] Bukovsky interview and article:
www.brusselsjournal.com/node/865 www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FVp8w_Oz0U
The new migrant detention center on Samos, Greece, opened December 1, 2007. (Caroline Brothers for the International Herald Tribune)
Obscurity and confinement for migrants in Europe
By Caroline Brothers Published: December 30, 2007
E-Mail Article
Listen to Article
Printer-Friendly
3-Column Format
Translate
Share Article
Text Size
They are in railroad depots. They are in old grain stores and recycled factories. Some are brand new, others are in adjuncts of prisons. One is on a ship anchored in the Dutch port of Rotterdam.
From Ireland to Bulgaria, from Finland to Spain, detention camps for foreigners have mushroomed across the European Union. They have emerged mostly over the past decade, as the region has grown less and less welcoming to migrants.
There are now 224 detention camps scattered across the European Union; altogether they can house more than 30,000 people - asylum-seekers and illegal immigrants awaiting deportation - who are often held in administrative detention for as long as 18 months. In a number of EU countries, there is no upper limit on detention length.
"Detention is a very serious measure in a democratic society - governments deprive people of their liberty when they are convicted of a serious crime," said Katrine Camilleri, a refugee lawyer in Malta with the Jesuit Refugee Service, which on Dec. 18 published a report on conditions in detention centers in the 10 newest EU states.
"These people have committed no crime, and though human rights law allows for detention in very specific cases, even then you can't detain people forever. Even 18 months is a very long time; it destroys them," said Camilleri, who has just been honored by the UN refugee agency for her work in the face of arson attacks on her car and home.
To Europe: At all costs
Tide of migrants strains Greek islands
Waves of migrants increase pressure on Greece
Desperation comes in all professions
In an Indian village, going abroad is a son's duty
Lies, grief and a ticket home for illegal Indian migrants
Gangs profit from smuggling of illegal immigrants into Europe
Political refugee from Togo seeks sanctuary
Fear and hope for African migrants in Canaries
Immigrants open new path to Europe
Multimedia
Map: Detention camps across Europe
» View
Today in Europe
EU leaders argue over whom to blame for Irish treaty vote
Italy struggles with immigrants and aging
Britain turns over documents on torture claims
The smallest centers hold a few dozen people; the biggest, more than 1,000. A network of them has quietly taken form with little scrutiny and few established norms, sometimes reusing old sites, like Rivesaltes in the south of France, which was one of the biggest French internment camps for Jews during World War II.
And they have spread outside of Europe to places like Libya, where Italy builds and pays for detention centers to house migrants it deports.
Governments contend that they are trying to manage a bureaucratic nightmare and contain a security risk: the rise of migration by stealth, in which people deliberately hide their identities when it suits their cause and clog up strained asylum systems with dubious claims.
The result is a patchwork of standards. Even the best centers are strung with cameras and coils of barbed wire; the worst are infested with vermin, lack medical care and, according to a 300-page study commissioned by the European Parliament, are subject to riots, arson attacks and suicides.
Dimitris Vouros, the lone court of appeal lawyer employed to assist refugees on the Greek island of Samos, was among those relieved to see its old detention center finally closed. Inside it, a year ago, protesting Iranian inmates sewed up their lips with wire.
"The new building is like a small hotel inside, but on the outside, half the community of Samos call it 'Guantánamo,' " Vouros said, of the new €2.5 million, or $3.7 million, establishment.
The psychological impact of incarceration can be severe, particularly for the young. In Denmark from 2001 to 2006 the rate of suicide attempts among inmates was six times that of the Danish population, according to the Danish Asylum Seekers Advice Bureau.
Governments are reluctant to admit to their existence, let alone permit entry to the camps; a reporter was denied access to centers in Greece and the Canary Islands of Spain; under the government of Silvio Berlusconi, Italy barred even the United Nations refugee agency from its center on the Italian island of Lampedusa. The current prime minister, Romano Prodi, allowed the agency in.
The camps are concentrated along Europe's eastern and southern borders, while a large swathe of them runs east-west through Poland, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Germany, according to Migreurop, a network of researchers and lawyers that has mapped the phenomenon.
Some of the largest ones are close to Europe's migration pressure points. The biggest is in the southern Italian town of Crotone, with 1,100 places, according to Migreurop; next, says Camilleri, are two in Malta with room for 800 each.
The total known capacity for all the "closed" EU camps is 30,871, according to the European Parliament study. When "open" camps, to which asylum-seekers are obliged to return at night, are included, the total rises to 40,979.
The establishment of these centers has failed to stanch the flow of migrants, and Europe is now looking for help beyond its borders. Bilateral agreements, raising concerns about dubious alliances and human rights violations, have given rise to camps in peripheral states like Morocco, Tunisia, Ukraine, Libya and Turkey.
Page one of a three page report.
With the new European arrest order which enables a foreign state to have a British person arrested here with no help from our government or police having us carted off to any God forsaken hole they see fit.
Note Geert Wilders..Jordan. has issued an arrest warrant for him! his own government have done nothing to protect their own Dutch MP.
lINK BELOW Machine playing up!
GLOBAL EDITION OF THE NEW YORK TIMES.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/12/30/europe/greece.php
REAL FREEDOM OF INFORMATION.
2005..
One of the main pushers in the UK for constitutional change are Charter 88, They have printed a speech from Neal Ascherson (a member of the Federal Trust Round Table like Charles Kennedy, Mandelson, BBC Political Editor Andrew Marr; and Eleanor Sharpston, who achieved the conviction of "Metric Martyr" Thoburn)
Some quotes just stick in your throat:
"the British doctrine of sovereignty is wrong"
"the fact is that the unreformed British State... is incompatible with European norms... Britain requires the sort of change which only revolutions carried out in the old days"
"...the British doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty, which I have already suggested to be obsolete and pernicious..."
"...increasing unity at the European surface and increasing diversity at regional level are in fact parts of a single development, the weakening of the nation-state.... that is why Maastricht not only designed fresh steps towards supranational unity, but also instituted the COR".
(Charter 88 Sovereignty lecture, 25.2.94, Local Government and the Myth of Sovereignty)
FABIANS set about destroying our sovereignty way back in time the speech has been recorded!... my words,
"Modernising Government" is also an excuse for 'Europeanising' - e.g the then Department of Environment, Transport & the Regions (DETR) says that 3 EU programmes will now influence local & regional planning, ending our "outdated isolation". (DETR website 24.2.98). The Cabinet Office has been leading "modernisation" with a private firm, English Partnerships, who trumpet the praises of EU funding and recruit 'promoters' at £50,000+ a year.
The Government is enthusiastically reorganising its own departments to focus on a regional agenda; although central government departments will continue, "regional government would be dominant." Its proposals are "not just consistent with the transition to regional government, but desirable for it". It does stress that regionalism will be a long term programme.
The Cabinet Office has a group, the Performance & Innovation Unit (PIU) which reported in February 2000 on "modernisation".
Its Reaching Out report, not exactly household reading, was honest that "EU funding" arrangements (i.e. the return of some of our own money) were complicated. It criticised "poor value for money" and admitted that they could either divert UK funds into lower priority areas or even produce conflict with our own initiatives. Its solution, however, seemed to be greater "harmonisation" at the expense of national arrangements.
The Regional Co-ordination Unit (RCU) wants "stronger connections with EU policies and stronger regional presentation of policies". Don't expect the Government, already UK No 1 in terms of advertising spend, to let up.
The Government Office for the East Midlands offers full guidance on how to promote the EU's "generosity" - such as the display of prominent signs that distort the truth.
Politically incorrect news to awaken sleeping minds.
“Diversity”- The Con Game
October 21, 2007
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
We are all affected by “Diversity” but FEW understand its true nature. Warning: It isn’t pretty.
“Diversity” is a massive long-term BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION program that uses minorities to DISINHERIT the majority. In English, “Diversity” means acknowledging different races, religions and “sexual orientations.” In New World Order doublespeak, “Diversity” is a devious way to dilute and discriminate against the white, heterosexual Christian majority in Europe, Canada and the US.
While it pretends to advocate equality, its real goal is to guilt mainly heterosexual White males into yielding position and power. The object is to prepare North America and Europe for inclusion in a “world government” run by the central banking cartel based in London. This private cartel’s power is measured by the fact that virtually every major corporation, educational institution and government agency provides “diversity training” (i.e. political re-education) to its employees. Even though studies show it has zero economic benefit, they spend eight billion dollars a year on it. Toyota alone plans to spend that much in the next ten years.
Here is an example of the shaming of Whites that takes place in these sessions. It is from the text, “Seeing Ourselves: Exploring Race Ethnicity and Culture” (1999) by Carl James.
A participant, Greg tells the group:
“As for my race, I am white but I never really had to think about it before. I don’t feel that it ever affected the people with whom I associated or talked to. My two best friends are Black and (Canadian) Indian. I was brought up in a family that didn’t believe in prejudice and I’m proud of that. If I don’t like a person, it is because of their personality, not their race or heritage.”
Now you’d think that Greg would pass with flying colors.
You didn’t consider the hidden agenda. The author, a Diversity trainer, chastises Greg for assuming he is “the norm.” Greg fails to acknowledge his “race privilege,” that “invisible package of unearned assets” that is the “white colonial legacy.” Whites like Greg deny “the ways in which they socially, culturally and politically produce relations of domination.” (p.44)
In other words, Whites naturally oppress other people. That sounds like vicious racism to me.
Can you see what’s happening? These Diversity sessions lay guilt trips on Whites, especially males, so they will yield power to compliant grateful minorities who have not earned it. THIS IS A SCAM. Anyone who objects to this political agenda commits career suicide. That’s political persecution.
I want to be clear that I think the human race is one family and God loves all people equally. Like Greg, I believe people should be judged on their merit alone, regardless of race, gender or sexual orientation. I have no problem with “minorities” winning positions of power so long as they do it fairly. I welcome the rich contribution immigrants make. I came to Canada when I was a baby in 1951.
But “Diversity” is NOT about fairness or enriching society. It promotes minorities not for their own sake, but as a way to UNDERMINE and CONTROL the majority.
It’s ironic that the central banking clique should lay this guilt trip on Whites when it is they who are responsible for imperialism and wars past and present. It is they who grew even richer through the slave and opium trades, and they who control organized crime today through their agents.
The U.S. population is more than 75% White and Christian. The plan is for Whites to become a minority by 2050 or sooner. Whites are expected to stand by and become guests in their own house.
When Whites are a minority, no one will champion their rights. There are two million more females than males at US universities. Have you heard of any affirmative action programs for males?
“Diversity” is practically unheard of in China, Japan, Israel, India and Latin America. These countries are allowed to keep their racial character. But because people of European origin have a sense of material, spiritual and political privilege, they are the hardest to absorb in the New World Order. They are the targets of the “Diversity” program.
The central bankers use the tactic of “divide and conquer” to undermine the four pillars of our identity: race, religion, nation and family.
First…they pretended to champion the workers to get rid of the Tsarist regime in Russia. Then they pretended to champion women and homosexuals to undermine heterosexual values and the family. Finally they are duping Whites to passively accept discrimination [against themselves] and a greatly diminished status. More>>www.henrymakow.com
[The TRUE MINORITY are Euro-Whites who represent a dissolving 10% of the world's population - and a mere 2% or 3% of White women are actually of child-bearing age. -Editor-]
Post a Comment